On January 6, 2022, I wrote an article on Patriot One News about the wide disapproval of the Biden-Harris administration giving rise to a possible run for President by none other than Hillary Clinton.
Given the insane amount of scandals Mrs. Clinton was involved in during her time as the Secretary of State, (mishandling sensitive documents, not having a security clearance, misuse of private e-mail to conduct government business, and the inaction at our Embassy in Libya during a terrorist attack that led to the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and two CIA operatives, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods), I’m gobsmacked that anyone would consider Mrs. Clinton a viable Presidential candidate.
When the People of our great Country voted in Donald Trump as our forty-fifth President, the storm of shameless untruths regarding President Trump’s character and allegiance was never-ending. Recently in Federal Court, it was confirmed through witness testimony and documentary evidence that Hillary Clinton was behind these blatantly false unfounded attacks.
When John Durham was named as a Special Prosecutor to investigate how the Obama-Era FBI conducted their so-called “probe” into Russian interference in the 2016 Election, I was cautiously optimistic. After years of investigation, perusing thousands of Federal documents, and painstakingly interviewing persons involved in the creation and dissemination of the debunked “Steele Dossier”, we are starting to see some results.
In September of 2021, a Federal Grand Jury indicted a former attorney for the Democratic National Committee, Michael Sussmann, alleging that he falsely claimed to the FBI that he was not working for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign when he raised the clarion call about ties between the Trump Organization and Russia. Sussmann portrayed himself as a “concerned citizen” who provided the “tip” to Federal Law Enforcement. This claim has been disproved by Federal Prosecutors during the trial, linking Sussmann through subpoenaed financial records to Hillary Clinton directly. One document, in particular, that was revealed during the trial was a bill of service to the Hillary Clinton campaign for meeting with the FBI. The lead prosecutor for this case, Deborah Brittain Shaw detailed an intricate plan, where technology experts in the employ of Clinton look for data that could smear Trump, to then leak the findings to the press and for Susmann to finally bring the information to the FBI.
The testimony taken on May 19th from former FBI General Counsel James Baker was very telling.
“WASHINGTON, DC — A former FBI official delivered devastating testimony Thursday against former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann — saying he’s ‘100% confident’ the defendant denied acting ‘on behalf of any particular client’ when he handed over since-debunked information linking Donald Trump and Russia.”
During Mr. Baker’s testimony, he stated that he probably wouldn’t have agreed to meet with Sussmann if he knew Sussmann was acting on behalf of the Clinton campaign. Baker further said that had Sussmann been upfront about being an operative for Hillary Clinton, Baker wouldn’t have treated him as a “confidential FBI source”. Documents submitted as prosecutorial evidence support the charges that Michael Sussmann has repeatedly lied to FBI Officials that he was not acting on behalf of any client. Baker also testified that the FBI’s investigation did not reveal there was some kind of back door communications between Donald Trump and Russia.
The stake to the vampire’s heart came from Robby Mook, a former Clinton Campaign Manager and a witness in this trial, who said during testimony on May 20, that Clinton agreed with discreetly pitching the Trump-Russia hoax to the media.
“Hillary Clinton personally signed off on a plan in 2016 to quietly pitch to the media the now-discredited theory that computer servers at former President Donald Trump’s company had a secret communications link with a Russian bank, her former campaign manager told a jury.”
Although Mook testified that Hillary Clinton did have an active involvement in disseminating false information to the mainstream media, he asserted that neither he nor anyone else working for Hillary’s campaign directed Sussmann to take the false information to the FBI.
So…what have we learned thus far that we didn’t already know? I believe that the majority of us have the opinion that the fix was in on Donald Trump’s campaign and his Presidency. There have been too many examples of how low his political rivals have gone to destroy him personally and professionally. What we’re witnessing now is the slow, careful process of investigation and trial. The Special Prosecutor is methodically unraveling a huge conspiracy, seemingly engineered by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, with Hillary’s apparent consent and knowledge, the mainstream media and the FBI, either as willing participants or as utterly incompetent hacks. Michael Sussmann’s trial is only one piece of the puzzle. The upcoming trial of Russian Analyst, Igor Danchenko, who contributed false information to the Steele Dossier, will also be something to pay attention to. Although the process has been extremely slow, the process is still moving forward, without the use of dirty, bushwhacking, libelous and slanderous tactics that have been utilized against President Trump.
To quote Donald Trump, “So I hope John Durham, for the good of the country, comes up with everything that you know took place, and everybody knows took place because it has been exposed.”
