HomeNewsThe Right Side of History... Who Will Be The Ultimate Judge Of...

The Right Side of History… Who Will Be The Ultimate Judge Of “Right” Versus “Wrong”?

Published on

“The great citizens of a country are not those who bend the knee before authority but rather those who, against authority, if need be, are adamant as to the honor and freedom of that country.” – Resistance, Rebellion & Death

In June 2020, I was told by someone close: “you need to get behind the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement. You don’t want to be on the wrong side of history.” This statement has reverberated in my mind over the past 16 months, prompting me to ask, am I on the right side of history? How will I know if I am on the right side of history? Who will be the ultimate judge of “the right side” versus the “wrong side?” Will it be those in academia who write the textbooks, the media who promote the propaganda of the Deep State? Will this play out at the Hague in front of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) when violations of the Nuremburg Code (1947) are brought to trial and perpetrators of medical tyranny are judged? Perhaps it will it be our children and grandchildren who ultimately determine where we fall on the spectrum of hindsight.

Ultimately, I reject the notion of relativism as defined by the Oxford Dictionary as:
“The doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute”.

I believe that, although people are by nature sinful, there IS a general moral code as substantiated by centuries of persons/cultures who have attempted to promote good over evil (although many times without success). Crimes such as murder, rape, theft, and human trafficking are generally looked upon on as not acceptable to society. But what about those who, in the past, have claimed they are promoting “the greater good” of society to normalize or justify heinous acts against the world?

Not long ago, as reported by Alexandra Minna Stern, Professor at the University of Michigan, 1/7/2016, “sterilization both was countenanced by the U.S. Supreme Court (in the 1927 Buck v. Bell case) and supported by many scientists, reformers, and lawmakers as one prong of a larger strategy to improve society by encouraging the reproduction of the “fit” and restricting the procreation of the “unfit.” In total, 32 U.S. states passed sterilization laws between 1907 and 1937, and surgeries reached their highest numbers in the late 1930s and early 1940s.” Most of these forced sterilizations were the “mentally handicapped and deficient,” homosexuals, prison inmates, promiscuous young women, and others labeled as feebleminded, sexually deviant, and prone to criminality. “Many sterilization advocates viewed reproductive surgery as a necessary public health intervention that would protect society from deleterious genes and the social and economic costs of managing “degenerate stock.” These barbaric ideas were sanctioned by the U.S. Supreme Court and resulted in approximately 60,000 Americans being made to undergo forced sterilization! (Alexandra Minna Stern, University of Michigan, August 26, 2020.)

Note that overall, the number of women outnumbered men, and black women were disproportionately affected. Did these lawmakers see themselves as being “on the right side of history?” When Japanese- American citizens were interned in camps during World War II, was this for the “greater good of society?” Did the zealots who burned “witches” at the stake in Salem aspire to be on the “right side”? Does “bringing democracy to Chile” justify Pinochet’s 15-year campaign of mass torture, rape and destruction as fringe groups like to claim? History judged him for the monster he was. Pinochet was most certainly on the wrong side of history.

So, who are these arbiters of greater good?

Is it Anthony Fauci, fervent promotor of vaccine collectivism, who recently informed American citizens: “You have got to look at it and say, there comes a time when you do have to give up what you consider your individual right of making your own decision for the great good of society,” and “… as a member of society, reaping all the benefits of being a member of society, you have a to society.”

Will the arbiters be the attorneys who ultimately state the cases of those with “vaccine” injuries to the courts? Will it be the families/loved ones of the greater than 16,000 persons (in the U.S. alone), who have died due to the experimental biologic agents? Who will determine the “right side of history?”

Do we wish to surrender to further governmental oversite, control, mandates and degradation of our God given liberties and freedoms in the United States as granted to us by God and preserved in our Constitution? Will our capitulation guarantee we will be “on the right side of history?” Who will define our historical moral compass for posterity?

We must reject the collectivist morality, as espoused by despots including Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Hitler, and others. History has shown time and again that such notions result in the advancement of societal control and totalitarianism, not the promotion of freedom and individual autonomy. History has not looked favorably on these individuals. I highly recommend the following 15 minute video which offers further insight into this topic:

I encourage those who know in their gut that something is NOT RIGHT, to remain strong. Hold the line. Do not succumb to the pressures and tactics being thrown at you. For by maintaining your strength, dignity, and moral integrity, you will most assuredly be on the “right side of history.”

Latest articles

Get The Daily Email!

More like this

WATCH: Full Tucker Carlson Interview With Obama’s Alleged Gay Crack Lover.

Full Tucker Carlson Interview With Obama’s Alleged Gay Crack Lover.

Trump Dealt Huge Blow In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Lawsuit, Timing Not Good

E. Jean Carroll won a partial victory in her defamation lawsuit against former President Trump on Wednesday.

Tucker Carlson’s Fox News Exit Erases $590 Million in Value, Shares Tumble 5.4%

Class A shares of Fox Corp. sank as much as 5.4% Monday, the most since October, after the company said Carlson had left with immediate effect.